On Sun, 14 May 2006, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> On Sun, 14 May 2006 12:10:14 +0200 (CEST) > Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [...] > > > > I'm all for such a message form; it should be easy to add with some -v > > > > switch... But > > > > - This is no use if the message code changes over time, > > > > because that is still the unique identifier for the error... > > > > - The message itself should not be given, IMHO. > > > > The program can look it up in the error message file... > > > > > > How can it find out, which message file to use? > > > > There is only 1 message file ? errore.msg for english... > > located next to the compiler binary... > > Some users are using the translated message files. How can a program find > out, which one the compiler is using? But that doesn't matter if the message itself is not included for machine-readable output ?! The code uniquely defines the message, and you can look it up in any language file you want, no ? That's the whole idea of machine-readable output ? Michael. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel