On Thursday 05 October 2006 14:52, Micha Nelissen wrote: > Ivo Steinmann wrote: > > Well, it's a good idea to enable typed addresses by default, but I have > > got one problem with that. The pointer to an array of a type should be > > allowed to assign to the pointer of the same type. > > > > Example > > > > T: array[-10..10] of Integer; > > P: PInteger; > > > > I request that "P := @T;" should be allowed, because a pointer type in > > objfpc mode are also treated as pointer to an array of that type, that > > means P[...] is allways allowed also. > > Just a note, there will be 3 ways to write the same thing then: > > P := T;
Is this really compatible? I think not. > P := @T; Not compatible. > P := @T[Low(T)]; Too long :) > A bit odd, no ? Although in all cases it's quite clear what is meant, > but I don't know if this "scales" to more complex expressions ? This is not the same thing :) -- Regards, Christian Iversen _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
