I've noticed Michael just added a "wget" package getter to the new packager.
We already had a small discussion about using lNet in the new packaging system and it comes down to this: The packager needs pure fpc solution, which lNet now is, but won't be later (eg: when openSSL is added) I'm willing to add the required networking support to the packager if you guys tell me "how". I mean, should I add lNet as a choice to package/base or fcl (not sure on which the packager actualy depends), or just "inside" the packager (eg: not in packages or fcl)? Personaly, I don't give a damn, I'm going to put lNet in packages/extra later and you need a stripped down version anyhow (eg: you don't need no openSSL support which forces a libc inside). Please don't start a flamewar about this, all I need to know if you want to use lNet for it, and how should I integrate it with the packager, no politics. -- Ales Katona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Toto je digitálne podpísaná časť správy
_______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
