I haven't worked through the ptopu.pp unit at all, just spotted the problem in the output generated. I'll have a look during the week to see if I can find at fix the bug. Just thought it would be done faster by however is maintaining the code.
I sure do understand the time issue working on open-source projects. Mine is limited too, so no worries. If I get stuck, I'll email you in private. Regards, - Graeme - On 3/19/07, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > Hi, > > I saved the default settings of 'ptop' to a file using the following > > ptop -g ptop.cfg > > Now using that config file with the -c parameter and not specifying it > at all should give me the same results, but it does! Anybody that can > shed some light on this. I'm in the process of creating a Borland > Object Pascal coding standards config file and came across this > stumbling block. > > Here is how I used the ptop application with the defaults and defaults > generated config file: > > 1) ptop test3.pp test3_out.pp > 2) ptop -c ptop.cfg test3.pp test3_out.pp > > > Here is the content of the test3.pp file > > -------------------[ test3.pp ]-------------------------- > procedure TestTryProc; > begin > > try ShowMessage ('Start'); try ShowMessage ('trying'); > try ShowMessage ('still trying'); > finally ShowMessage ('going...'); end; > except ShowMessage ('except'); end; > finally ShowMessage ('Finally!'); end; > > end; > -------------------[ end ]-------------------------- > > > Here is the output of 1) above. Notice the difference in indentation > of the try/finally and try/except blocks in 1) and 2). I don't have much time at the moment, and it has been a long time since I looked at the ptopu unit. The unit was originally intended for TP code, and try/finally/end did not exist back then. The support I added for this was a quick hack. I'm sorry to say that at the moment I don't have time to look at the config file problem, so you'll have to do some testing :/ If you mail me in private, I can try to help. Michael. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
-- Graeme Geldenhuys There's no place like S34° 03.168' E018° 49.342' _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel