We already have the generics can the preprocessor symbols. That leaves the
"for in". The development team has its doubts about the "for in"
construct, but:
* Andreas did it in a reasonably clean way with a lot less hacks and
ugly constructions than Delphi did.
* The pressure on us is increasing to have a "for in".
AFAIK, Chrome does extended "for in" or similar stuff.
Case-string seems very handy in many cases and does not look like
imposing problems.
-Michael
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
