Vinzent Hoefler schrieb: > On Wednesday 11 July 2007 06:39, Florian Klaempfl wrote: > >> That's a point though I thought we could safe this extra check >> because I didn't expect that a lot of people are still using PII :) > > Well, if the OS supports SSE and thus no SIGILL is generated, what would > be the point in using CPUID to check for SSE *after* that at all? ;)
To get the level of sse support but this is not used by the system iirc so we can swap these checks indeed. > > Honestly, I don't think that "extra check" would hurt anyone. > > > Vinzent. > > _______________________________________________ > fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org > http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel