> Michael Van Canneyt schreef: > > > > On Sat, 3 Nov 2007, Marco van de Voort wrote: > > > >> Don't get too worked up about plugin architectures in the AutoCAD sense. In > >> practice it is way simpler, like only shipping one BPL to a custom if he > >> @([EMAIL PROTECTED] paid for it. This means you can have one main binary, > >> in which a hand > >> full of acquisition BPLs register themselves. > > > > This is actually more or less what I would have liked to get through, yes. > > > > Thanks Marco :-) > > So, it is actually commercially driven and therefore not a thing you > look for in a OSS environment ;-)
No. It is time driven. And we don't code everything in plain C in OSS either. So why limit ourselves to that with library interfaces? _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
