On 04/12/2007, Mark Morgan Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think the point stands however about poor language support for the concept > in the fairly early days. However from the point of view of FPC I think we've > got to work out whether there's scope for improvement of threads etc. (e.g.
That's exactly the point I was trying to make with this message thread. By implying that *if* Microsoft (with all their money and research) found a better way to use threads and multicore processors, maybe FPC could take some hints and implement it in RTL. That's only if Microsoft came up with something new that the wonderful FPC developers haven't thought of yet. :-) Regards, - Graeme - _______________________________________________ fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/ _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
