> Provided that it's a lot easier to create a compiler for CIL than > creating it for multiple CPUs and OSes, IMHO, this is the way to go on > the long run. (But of course native code will widely be in use for > several years to come :) ).
If this was true, Java would have taken that market already. There is nothing new to that aspect of CIL, and specially with only one minor vendor supporting it. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
