On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 02:32:02 -0700 "Boian Mitov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree with your points, and I listed some of them. > Pascal has its own long list of issues, such as lack of functional > and block enclosement (Especially true in Lazarus and free Pascal). > Conceptual programming is what STL does as example. You declare a > concept and then you do implementations. C++ conceptual support is > not very user friendly however, but still works. They may add some > more support for conceptual programming in the next ANSI standard, > but I have not checked it out yet. > In conceptual programming you can create concepts that will work on > anything. The concepts will work on Integers or objects as well as on > any type of container. There are number of books on STL and > conceptual programming. > Personally I think C++ is just not very good in it, but Pascal simply > can't do it. This was added recently: See language reference 'generics' (chapter 8 in pdf). Mattias _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
