Michael Schnell schrieb: > >> If you want to have good multicore scaling you are lost with OpenMP. > As I said, that is my POV, too. > > I did not start this discussion for preaching for OpenMP. In fact I know > close to nothing about it. My starting point were the rather poor > results for FPC in the "shootout" tests and "parallel" keyword you can > use with "for" in the Oxygen/Prism Object Pascal language. > > I am not in a position to evaluate any implementation details, but I > feel that not supporting parallelism as a language construct looks like > a shortcoming of FPC's and so I think there might be room for improvement.
Moving things in the language without a notable advantage which can be solved by a library is not a good thing. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - [email protected] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
