Michael Schnell schrieb: > >> OK, so here goes again yet another discussion... :-) >> > No wonder, as the current state is working, but rather disappointing :). > (No idea if D2009 is different / better: this seems to be the cause of > the new thread.)
We can implement a D2009 like solution and break a lot of old code :) _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
