On 11 Nov 2008, at 12:33, Michael Schnell wrote:

It will at best be "friendly old school behaviour which works most of the time, but which fails as soon as the strings are not completely normalised because then you can have decomposed characters and whatnot" (which in turn easily leads to security holes due to incomplete checks, hard to reproduce bugs and "write once, debug everywhere"-style behaviour).
Sorry, I don't understand. What not normalized behavior needs to be taken into account ?

Because e.g. on the ext3 file system, you can have two files with the name "ü" in the same directory. One named using the single character "ü" and one named using as the string "u¨" (both in utf-8). If you make the compiler automatically normalise everything, you lose information (and get the security holes etc).


Jonas_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Reply via email to