If just ignoring the fact is enough support, OK, it's supported :).
What FUD is this? Pleaes give an example where the FPC compiler doesn't
handle multi byte ansistrings properly.
Sorry for bad language :( ! I did not mean to be aggressive. (Did you
see the smile indicator ?)
I did not suggest it handles this wrong in any way, but I just don't see
in what way there might be any explicit compiler support for multi-byte
ANSI. (You did mention the RTL function provided.)
I understand that there never has been a discussion on if there should
be any explicit compiler support for multi-byte ANSI, but this thread
_is_ a discussion on explicit compiler support for Unicode.
-Michael
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
