Zitat von Michael Schnell <mschn...@lumino.de>:
Mattias Gärtner wrote:
The @ operator is more than "address of".
Hmm "Address of" is not that simple in itself. :)
With a "Procedure of Object", "@" of course handles the Self pointer, too.
I suppose to find the address of a function "@" uses the Virtual Method
Table found with the Self pointer.
So in fact there are (at least) two ways of implementing a compare
between two pointers to "Procedure of Object" variables, that IMHO both
make sense:
1) Simply compare the Self and the Address part (the same function of
two implementations of a class are different)
2) Compare only the address (the same function of two implementations of
a class are identical, unless overloaded by a child's function).
I think it's a matter of taste (I do vote for (2) ).
No.
It is a matter of consistency.
The current comparison is not intuitive. This is proven by the many
places where it used wrong and the almost zero places where it is used
right (Is there any one at all?).
The problems are:
1. It exists for years, so there might be code depending on this. I
doubt this.
2. It is Delphi/TP compatible. So it can not be done in mode
delphi/tp. That's why I propose to change it in mode objfpc.
If the compiler team refuses to change it, can at least a "hint" be given?
Mattias
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
