Vinzent Höfler пишет:
Sergei Gorelkin <sergei_gorel...@mail.ru>:
4) The syntax 'for element in list using TListIterator' is kind of
redundant. I'd suggest:
for element in list.GetForwardIterator do ..., or even
for element in list.GetSubItems(arguments) do ...
Wat's the return type of those functions? TIterator?
Probably yes. A possibility to use any type which has certain
methods/operators instead looks attractive, but I'm afraid it would be
hard to fit that into existing compiler model.
Sergei.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
