Martin Schreiber schrieb: > On Tuesday 10 November 2009 19:08:45 Florian Klaempfl wrote: >> Martin Schreiber schrieb: >>> On Tuesday 10 November 2009 18:33:54 Florian Klaempfl wrote: >>>>> Did you look into the code in cpstrnew branch? I did. >>>> And which changes are exactly the reason for your concerns? >>> More checks >> Where? A pure unicodestring routine won't get additional checks. >> >>> and more complicated address calculation. >> Where? Adding 16 instead of 12 makes no difference. >> >> The "major" difference will be the initialization of the additional >> fields and the increased memory requirement of 4 bytes per string. >> > I try to prove the exciting statement. How can I build a startup compiler for > the cpstrnew branch or
I use the 2.2.4/2.4.0 ide to build the compiler, so make in the cpstrnew branch compiler dir should work using 2.2.4/2.4.0 > how to compile the cpstrnew branch? Since it's a branch, I'am not sure if usual building works. We're still at the point to add new stuff and rework things so it might be heavily broken. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
