Florian Klaempfl <[email protected]>:

> Vinzent Höfler schrieb:
> > Florian Klaempfl <[email protected]>:
> > 
> >> A VAROUT parameter could have the same semantics as VAR except that the
> >> compiler does not expect that it is needed that it is initialized. But
> >> be warned: with such a parameter type you can easily create memory
> leaks
> >> with automated types like ansistrings.
> > 
> > I don't understand the issue. 
> 
> Indeed, I noticed :)

Care to explain why the programmer can easily determine something which seems 
to be an unsolvable problem for the compiler, although both have exactly the 
same information?


Vinzent.

-- 
GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist  -  [email protected]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Reply via email to