On Monday 25 January 2010 17:16:59 Michael Schnell wrote: > > @Martin: > what is the complicated thread save stuff with sys_semdestroy() > necessary for ? > Would it not be useful to use a Futex instead of a sema ? > Possible, I don't touch such code if it works - or if I think it works. ;-) Do you think a futex is cheaper than an interlockedincrement()?
Martin _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
