JoshyFun wrote: > > To base change colors you must change from high resolution to lower > resolution, not the inverse, you should not define colors in 48 bits > based in their values of 24 bits, but the inverse.
Yes, that is always ideal, but I can only work with what I know and what I can find on the internet. If you have a link on the internet that defines color values in 48bit, then please do post it here. I have search for the last 30 minutes and haven't found a single link. All colors I could find are defined as 24-bit RGB values (certified values and color names created by companies like Microsoft, HP, Adobe, W3C, Exif etc.), so that is what I based my calculations on. Using ratios to do the upscaling calculation seems to be the most common conversion method too - as per the links I found on the internet (wikipedia and many websites like Adobe or other photographic websites). But yes I understand the most accurate would be to only downscale - but I can't find color name definitions in 48-bit color. > That's why things like Pantone exists as they provide a clear > definition of each color. I'll read some more on Pantone - I don't really know much about it. :) Regards, - Graeme - -- fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/ _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
