On 4 May 2010 10:11, Florian Klaempfl <flor...@freepascal.org> wrote: > > Because it has no advantage over a win32 executable (it is very unlikely > that the compiler needs more than 2 or 3 GB and a native win64 compiler > is slower due to bigger memoy footprint) and because it would require > additional release preparations.
BTW: So why is there a native 64-bit Linux compiler? Shouldn't the same as what you mentioned apply to the Linux platform too? [if not, then I guess it's proof that the Windows platform is crap and slow. ;-)] -- Regards, - Graeme - _______________________________________________ fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/ _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel