On 4 May 2010 10:11, Florian Klaempfl <flor...@freepascal.org> wrote:
>
> Because it has no advantage over a win32 executable (it is very unlikely
> that the compiler needs more than 2 or 3 GB and a native win64 compiler
> is slower due to bigger memoy footprint) and because it would require
> additional release preparations.


BTW:
So why is there a native 64-bit Linux compiler?  Shouldn't the same as
what you mentioned apply to the Linux platform too? [if not, then I
guess it's proof that the Windows platform is crap and slow. ;-)]



-- 
Regards,
  - Graeme -


_______________________________________________
fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit
http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Reply via email to