On Fri, 14 May 2010 17:08:41 +0200 (CEST) Michael Van Canneyt <mich...@freepascal.org> wrote:
>[...] > > Probably because the former parser only parsed the interface. > > Maybe fpdoc now tries to parse the implementation too? That's not > > needed, is it? > > It should stop at the implementation keyword ? Yes. I think implementation needs good comments. The local types and variables don't need fpdoc docs, do they? If someone wants to use fpdoc for implementation, maybe it should be made optional? Mattias _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
