On 19 May 2010, at 16:21, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
I really don't see a the problem here. FPC often implements things
that
have far greater chances of breaking existing code - I just pointed
out
another such example a few days ago.
I don't have an opinion on the current discussion, but you are
comparing apples to oranges here. This discussion is about extending
base classes of the RTL. The other discussion was about a fix for a
bug in the typing system of the compiler (a bug that simply had to be
fixed to make the language's typing system sound again).
Jonas
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
