Sent from my iPhone
On 19 May 2010, at 17:52, Graeme Geldenhuys <graemeg.li...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 19 May 2010 17:36, Marco van de Voort wrote:
I don't see why the observer pattern is needed at such low level
any more
than 20 other little handy features that each would be a lot easier
if they
just had a field/property in the baseclasses.
Marco, not trying to be rude, but please take a step back, see the big
picture and listen to yourself. You sound totally ridiculous - it's
to the point of being funny.
I don't think so. I'd hate to see any specific pattern being
implemented at a base level. Why? Exactly what Marco said. Patterns
are faddy - you are not going to please everyone. I'd rather see a
mechanism for injecting first class extensions to existing classes.
That way, it really doesn't matter what pattern is implemented where.
That would be far more worthwhile IMO.
M
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
