On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 18:59 +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > On 19 May 2010 16:20, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > > I have an implementation in place, which doesn't affect too much the > > existing classes: it adds 1 public property and one private method; There is > > no impact on code efficiency.
> 1) Ignore Marco and implement it any way. I think you have just as > much say as Macro on what goes into the FPC. Ok, Graeme, I haven't read the rest of the waterfall of messages in this thread yet. But here you are going too far. Way too far. Imho we don't need someone in our community who tries to drive the community apart by setting people up against each other. It's also not necessary to send looooonnggg mails to discuss something as this. It only costs us energy, which we can spend better. If the result of this sort of discussions is that we loose developers, we can only loose. You are the only one gaining energy with discussions like this, it seems. Stop that. It's doesn't help anyone. We have to discuss things here reasonable. It's shoudn't be the case that you win when you are the loudest screamer. Joost. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
