Am 31.07.2010 02:23, schrieb Marco van de Voort: > In our previous episode, Hans-Peter Diettrich said: >>> As a first step, I consider the result of >>> cd compiler >>> time make cycle >>> with a hot disk cache before and after a change as good enough to see if >>> a change hurts performance. >> >> What's the Windows equivalent of "time"?
I use fpc/tests/utils/fptime.pp > > (I wouldn't do performance testing on Windows, the buildtime is > significantly longer there, which skews results) For make cycle it doesn't matter much especially since the windows rtl make file uses a build unit. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
