On 06/08/2010 11:31, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Alexander Klenin said:
punctuation is not even 100% required to understand natural language.
Correct. That is why reducing it to a required minimum is a good thing.
It is not, for the same reason all redundancy is not stripped from natural
languages either. It improves reading speed and integrity at only a small
cost.
Correct they are not: I/you have <> He has. The form of the Verb
(partly) includes the the subject. And there are reasons for the
duplicity: recovery if part of the info was lost (bad pronunciation, bad
handwriting)
In a programming language, a certain duplicity, can help finding errors,
because the 2nd part (duplicity) is either known or limited to a
specific set => the compiler can raise an error if it doesn't fit
That is the problem with C: you can have embedded assignments to
if ((a=a+1)>2) { }
could be
if ((a+=1) >2) { }
but that may well be a typo, the += may have meant to be a simple +
-------------
Readability is not equal to the sortest form of expressing something, in
fact, the shortest form often lacks readability => hence many people
dislike reg expression (which infact can be wonderfully short.
in perl:
$a := 11;
if ( ('x' x $a) =~ /^(..+)\1+$/ ) { print "$a is prime"; }
It's short, isn't it? readable? (and it doesn't work on $a=1, but anyway)
Readability, is also a lot do to with waht you are *used* to read. Once
you are used to a language,m or to reg-exp, or to whatever, it appears
easy to read. (and write). But before....
And this thread to me looks just like another: Well I am used to
language "x" where it looks like that, couldn't we make pascal look the
same, so it becomes all easier.
And imho the answer is: Why make pascal look more like every other
language. If that's what is wanted, then let's create a new language,
taking the best out of all other languages...
That "+=" is (sometimes) called "c style assignment" already says it all.
And, since I also refuse to learn from the faults of others, some
sarcasm in the end:
begin end is awfull amount of typing => can we replace it with something
shorter? "{" is unfortunately taken, but why need an actual char => just
identify a block, by indenting each line of the block, much less
clutter, all the extra begin/end can go....
Martin
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
