> -----Message d'origine----- > De : fpc-devel-boun...@lists.freepascal.org [mailto:fpc-devel- > boun...@lists.freepascal.org] De la part de Jonas Maebe > Envoyé : Tuesday, October 12, 2010 10:51 AM > À : FPC developers' list > Objet : Re: [fpc-devel] x86_64 stabs info - patch (sort of) > > > On 12 Oct 2010, at 10:25, Pierre Free Pascal wrote: > > > This means that indeed stabs and dwarf register number are equal, > > at least for GDB. > > > > The problem is that this means that we probably also need to > > distinguish between stabs32 and stabs64, as we already do for > > dwarf32 and dwarf64... > > There is no stabs64 format, afaik. See > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9327
I think that dwarf32 and dwarf64 here only refers to i386 32-bit registers versus amd64 64-bit registers. It is in that meaning that I said that we should use the dwarf64 column of x86reg.dat to implement the stabs register number for x86_64 CPU. Pierre _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel