Jonas Maebe wrote:

On 13 Oct 2010, at 09:58, Sven Barth wrote:

Am 05.10.2010 10:13, schrieb Jonas Maebe:

A couple of days ago I fixed an error in svn trunk for ARMEL that caused
the stack to become temporarily unbalanced after performing syscalls
with 5 or more parameters (the bug is still there for OABI, but I can't
fix that because I don't have access to an OABI machine).

I have an ARM board with an OABI kernel running (because I wasn't yet eager enough to test how FPC behaves with an EABI uclibc ^^).

If you can tell me what I need to look out for I might be able to help you there.

I now looked at the current actual code for OABI syscalls and it seems that the problem does not happen there. For OABI, the quick-exit trick is only used in a single stackframe-less function, and that's fine. Sorry for the false alarm.

sorry for jumping in. I have a complex OABI application based on fpc 2.2.x and I um using a syscall with 5 parameters heavily. I had no problems so far, the applications runs stable. I am worried now, if I should adapt the actual OABI code to the old RTL?

Regards, Bernd.

_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Reply via email to