Am 19.10.2010 10:20, schrieb Sven Barth: > Am 19.10.2010 10:12, schrieb Florian Klaempfl: >> Am 19.10.2010 09:32, schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys: >>> Op 2010-10-19 08:59, Paul Ishenin het geskryf: >>>> >>>> The most wanted feature is "Unicode string support". >>> >>> What Hans-Peter meant is that even if he does implement Unicode String >>> support, that would require changes in the compiler. Florian apparently >>> doesn't like any changes to the compiler, >> >> When did I say this? What I said was: I won't merge changes into trunk >> which implement support for alternative parsers (this is the topic of >> this thread!) because nobody could explain me yet the use of alternative >> parsers for FPC users. So I would spend time in something with no gain >> for users resulting in even less time for other problems. Maybe somebody >> else will merge it, but he takes the burden to fix any regressions and >> maintain the changed code. >> > > To be honest (as someone who hasn't yet posted to this topic): You > sounded very much like "we don't want to merge this" with "we" as in > "the core devs".
When did I write "we"? I think my initial statement was pretty clear: http://lists.freepascal.org/lists/fpc-devel/2010-October/022335.html _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
