On 13.11.2010 14:59, Martin wrote:
The illegal expression is ok.
But why saying that "Except" was expected? Imho that is misleading,
since the source can continue with anything else here
I can only assume the following:
Before an "except" or a "finally" the ";" is optional (like in every(?)
block). Thus after a statement without a ";" either a "finally" or an
"except" is expected and the compiler simply assumes that it's in a
"try...except" block first. Or it's just because "except" is declared
before "finally" in the token array which is kept ordered by token
length first and lexicographically second.
Regards,
Sven
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
