On 04 Jul 2011, at 17:33, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote: > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Jonas Maebe <jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be> wrote: >> This is virtually always caused by differences in the interface and >> implementation definition of some routines. Examples of ways in which this >> can happen: >> a) inline routines: the body of the inline routine changes the interface >> definition as far as the compiler is concerned >> b) routines that are declared normally in the interface, but as "external" >> in the implementation > > Any more examples?
No. > It seams like it would be excelent if the compiler could issue a > warning when it decides that a unit has the interface / implementation > problem and requires recompilation... If you compile with -vtu, the compiler says exactly that when it says that the interface crc has changed. It cannot say which particular definition is responsible for that. Jonas_______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
