[Is there any method to either comment on or re-open resolved isses? It is very frustrating to be forced to switch comminication channel]
I think this issue is resolved prematurely. First, I do not see a reason why normal property can not be implemented by static field. Second, even is such a reason is provided, compiler should error out instead of generating bogus code (Optimal solution would be to issue a warning or hint and generate correct code). Either way, "no change required" is IMHO wrong resolution. -- Alexander S. Klenin _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
