On Wed, 14 Sep 2011, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
<mich...@freepascal.org> wrote:
Current strategy on fpc core seems to be to have 2 RTLs:
One with unicode string, one with ansistring.
Isn't that somewhat nasty for people currently using UTF-8?
No, why do you think so ?
They should use the unicode version. All will work as-is.
Michael.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel