On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 22:40, Florian Klämpfl <flor...@freepascal.org> wrote: > Am 03.10.2011 13:23, schrieb Alexander Klenin: >> >> This way, you can develop much faster, without the need to fight for >> your changes, > > Others call this fighting "review" and consider it as important part to > improve software quality.
I'd say there is a continuum between those extremes, and (unfortunately) from my point of vew, FPC review is sometimes rather close to the former. I have been burned by this myself. Anyway, what I suggest is IMO a good compromise and should satisfy both sides -- Felipe can continue development of his packages unobstucted, while the quality of FPC will not suffer. I do not really see any downsides -- perhaps there is a section of users who use FPSpreadsheet and NOT use Lazarus, but I suspect this section is very small. -- Alexander S. Klenin _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
