On Wednesday 02 of November 2011 15:47:46 you wrote: > On Wed, 2 Nov 2011, zeljko wrote: > > On Wednesday 02 of November 2011 14:53:05 you wrote: > >> You must do also a localtime_r after this call. > >> clock_gettime returns the same time as gettimeofday. > > > > But point IS in comparing clock_gettime() vs. gettimeofday() which is > > used by fpgettimeofday(). I don't see localtime_r() calls in current RTL > > Now(). > > Ok. > > It turns out that Now() was doing a fpGettimeofday (for time) and a fptime > (for date), which is of course really stupid.
Yes, I saw that after posted example. > > I improved that (it does one call only). So, new stats, 64-bit, no > optimizations: > > sb: >./unixclocks > RTL Now() with 10000000 calls = 3698 ms > Kernel clock_gettime() NowReal() with 10000000 calls = 6564 ms > > Revision 19572. > > The time is now less than the Libc time you posted (5085ms). I don't care about libc timing, but why clock_gettime() is so slower now ? It is called only once in my example. Are you sufre that RTL now() returns correct date/time ? > > I can't test the libc version, but if you'd care to re-test using the above > revision of unix/sysutils.pp, and post the results, I'd be grateful. Sorry, but I don't want to use 2.7.1 until it's useable. zeljko
_______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel