On Sat, 17 Dec 2011, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:

michael.vancann...@wisa.be schrieb:


On Sat, 17 Dec 2011, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:

Michael Van Canneyt schrieb:


Feel free to create this program. If I may give some advice: the tasks you outline belong in a "Documentation writers IDE".

To some degree, maybe. But checking for updates should be doable by a script, without a need to open an IDE - for every single package!

I have done so for years, with the existing tools, using the Makefiles. No changes were necessary.

Can you explain that a bit more? I'm not a professional commandline user, perhaps I'm doing something stupid?

I just do a "make updatexml" or "make updatefclxml" or "make updatertlxml"

The makefile contains all commands necessary to create a unitname.new.xml for all units that have changed modifiers. It tries to remove "empty" ones.

BTW I mean tracking changes in the source code, which require to update the documentation files accordingly (makeskel --update ...). I don't see how a Makefile is involved in this task? This is different from the following:

Currently changes to the RTL and FCL (MakeFiles) require a dry-run of make, analysis of the resulting commandline, and a manual merge with the existing project. According to the Unix philosophy another tool is required, that automates the project file update, and one more for updating the project file when description files are added...

According to Unix philosophy, the person doing so is aware of what he is doing, and makes the necessary changes (if there are such changes) to the project file himself.

I do not believe the tools can make the correct decisions, except in the
most trivial circumstances.

The tool should update the file lists *only* (input, descr), and leave everything else in the project file unmodified. This has not been a big problem with textual INI files, but the XML project files can contain further information (element attributes...), that is interleaved with the filename entries.

It's not a technical issue. It's an issue that the tool does not know whether something requires changing or not.

The makefile can create the .new.xml files, but a human (me) needs to examine them and decide if something needs to be merged to the original files or not. This decision cannot be automated.

Michael.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Reply via email to