On 06/15/2012 02:39 AM, Alexander Klenin wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Mattias Gaertner
<nc-gaert...@netcologne.de> wrote:
What do you think?
Why not -- although IMO it would be much better to have some
lagnuage-level support
for things like single-owner semantics.
Yep. I think parallel loops and futures like defined in Prism might be
quite user-friendly.
Regarding an implementation fast enough to take real advantage of
multiprocessor boxes, a native support for Futex (instead of going via
the pthread library) might be helpful (no idea about the Windows and Mac
equivalents).
Maybe the (speed-wise) somewhat sub-optimal (regarding most C compilers)
implementation of (on some processors/OSes) threadvars might be improved.
-Michael
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
