On 10 Sep 2012, at 22:58, Daniël Mantione wrote: > Op Mon, 10 Sep 2012, schreef Jonas Maebe: > >> No, sets are an opaque data type. Their internal format is undefined. > > I knew you would answer to that :) While, I disagree that a set is opaque, > but, we can skip that discussion. What's going on here is that, wether it is > a good idea or not, the implementor of the QT interface units is trying to > provide Pascal data types to its user. Given the fact you are doing that, a > set of enum is IMO as reasonable as other weak type to strong type mappings.
If you want to do that, you need to add a layer in between that converts the sets into integer bitmasks in a reliable, portable and future-proof way. Jonas_______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
