On Thursday 04 October 2012 21:54:19 Thomas Schatzl wrote: > Basically the difference between armel and armhf are > - fpc cannot create valid armhf shared libraries > > Other problems common to both (just from interpreting the testsuite > results, filtering known failing tests): > - there are issues with threading/synchronization (test machine is a > quad-core box, previous test machine was single core where as usual such > problems don't show up) > - fpu exceptions/setting fpu exception mask seem to not work > - some problems with fpc resources Thx for the info
In the Qt binding I need to do this SetExceptionMask([exDenormalized,exInvalidOp,exOverflow,exPrecision,exUnderflow,exZeroDivide]); because of Qt C++ not allowing such exceptions is this a problem ? _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
