Pierre Free Pascal wrote:
-----Message d'origine-----
De : fpc-devel-boun...@lists.freepascal.org [mailto:fpc-devel-
boun...@lists.freepascal.org] De la part de Mark Morgan Lloyd
Envoyé : lundi 15 octobre 2012 15:39
À : fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
Objet : [fpc-devel] Testing MIPS: newbie questions
In trunk, is there any particular reason why tbs/tb0072.pp refers to
CPUSMIPS rather than CPUMIPS?
This is probably an error on my side :(
Fixed in rev 22655,
thanks for noticing!
I notice that in system.pp and in linux/ptypes.inc etc., conditionals
refer to CPUMIPS while in other places they refer to CPUMIPS32 and/or
CPUMIPSEL32. Is this correct?
CPUMIPS is defined for both mips big endian and little endian targets,
CPUMIPSEL is defined only for little endian mips target,
CPUMIPSEB is defined only for big endian mips target.
CPUMIPS32 is here to specify that it is a 32bit system,
and to possibly separate out future 64bit specific code.
(Nothing ready on this side yet...)
I am not sure all of the uses in rtl are really correct
(in the sense that they apply to the right sub-category of target...)
Please do not hesitate to report all suspicious instances.
There are still plenty of bug in the code generator,
help would be most appreciated!
Thanks for that. What I actually started with this morning was
revisiting http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Native_MIPS_Systems and
trying to crossbuild the RTL. I'm afraid that I didn't get very far
which led me to look at the defines... should this work yet, or is a
full test run a prerequisite?
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
