Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 22/12/12 16:43, Marco van de Voort wrote:
I think you have a wrong idea on what the core list contains.

LOL. And how is anybody supposed to know what goes on - it is a PRIVATE
mailing list.

Which is why I suggested that a semi-formal way of taking disputes to it might be in order, /provided/ that the results were summarised for the public. I don't think that public name-calling is at all in the interest of the community of Object Pascal users as a whole, and note that I'm including both the dwindling band of classic Borland customers and the users of FPC and Lazarus in this.

Many of use non-core developers have given our input with multiple
solutions, to try and help the private discussions along. But I guess
all of us are not knowledgeable enough people. What a nice F*** Y** to
the community.

Graeme, if you don't like it then consider forking the project. However, I'd suggest that if you even start along that path the prerequisite is better documentation, and to get anywhere with that you'll need to work cordially with the existing developers for the foreseeable future. Which is something that, frankly, I think you find difficult.

--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk

[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Reply via email to