On 05 Jan 2013, at 12:16, Martin Schreiber wrote: > On Saturday 05 January 2013 11:42:29 Sven Barth wrote: >> I think it was more meant in the context of the mailing list instead of >> a technical context. Like in "we had this topic a thousand times and >> maybe it's better we shut up about it now before we get moderated". > > Correct. :-)
Then maybe I should just stop completely answering any questions about this, because apparently not answering completely enough to your liking gets interpreted as telling you to shut up or getting moderated. Just like Sven I don't understand where this interpretation comes from, and I strongly resent it. I didn't answer because I thought the information was all in my previous answers already, and if someone else felt they could clarify it better than I did, they were free to do so. My time is also finite, and trying to get me to elaborate further by getting my on my high horse because I feel I'm being misrepresented, is something that will not work very well in the long term. It will much more likely result in silence than in more help. Jonas_______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
