Since I don't know the fpc cdoebase, I can not check this myself.
I suspect it is a gdb issue. But if it is not to much work, maybe
someone who does know fpc dwarf generation can check that it is not fpc?
I got the following source:
type TFoo = array [0..191] of integer;
and in gdb
ptype TFoo
Using dwarf, up to gdb 7.2 (inclusive) the result is ok.
but 7.3 up reports
array [0..-65] of LONGINT
SO definitely something changed in GDB.
But I do not know if the old or new gdb is right.
---------
So my guess is fpc declares the index as byte sized type.
If someone can confirm this, and that fpc declares it as unsigned in the
dwarf info, then it is a gdb issue.
Thanks
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
