In our previous episode, Sven Barth said: > up with a draft for the Tuple type which is thought by many people to be > a better alternative to "for-in-index". > > Please note the following points: > * This is not the final specification for Tuples and thus open to > discussion (there are still some issues with this draft that need to be > solved) > * I won't implement this feature myself (at least not in the near > future) as I have other topics on my list (most importantly generics > once type helpers are commited), so Alexander is free to give the task > for implementation to his student.
In a quick read, I cannot see any limitations to the type used for a tuple-element except that it behaves like "file of..." So that would mean a record type (or other non variant compatible type) would qualify? _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
