27.01.13, 1:43, Sven Barth wrote:
Based on the results of the "for-in-index" thread I've decided to come up with a draft for the Tuple type which is thought by many people to be a better alternative to "for-in-index".
I think it is big overkill to implement a new base type for such a small task as returning a key in for-in loop.
And (for Michael) I don't see any beauty in this. Imo, initial index extension is much more beauty than suggested here (a,b,c) := d; constructions.
Best regards, Paul Ishenin _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
