Am 21.06.2013 10:36 schrieb "Michael Schnell" <mschn...@lumino.de>: > > On 06/21/2013 09:54 AM, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote: >> >> >> Again I'd assume that the memory allocation for the result is the most expensive operation with UnicodeString operands, independent from string lengths. >> > > Do you suggest that with UnicodeString - even when using 1 Byte encoding types such as ANSIxxx or UTF-8 -, the memory allocation is more expensive than with the older String handling implementation ?
Just to clear up the names: UnicodeString is *not* the code page aware string type (although they share the "metadata" record). It is a dynamic length 2 byte string. The code page aware string type is AnsiString. Regards Sven
_______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
