Apologies that I've broken the thread, but some messages don't get through our gateway- for some reason I'm seeing the message I'm quoting arriving as an encoded attachment.

[Sven said]
> If you'd now only explain what a cross-reference tool is I might even
> understand what you're trying to tell me here...

I think what he means is that he wants a tool that will annotate each procedure/function/method call in the source with the file and line number that it transfers control to. That's obviously going to be a problem in a language like Object Pascal which supports virtual methods, where the actual target isn't known until execution time.

> Otherwise we also rely on external tools (mostly the GNU linker)
> here. So as a first step you'd choose the approach of using an
> external assembler and linker, because simply calling a third party
> utility is easier than completely implementing an internal assembler
> and linker.

With the caveat here that as I understand it experienced IBM programmers avoid the GNU assembler like the plague, since it doesn't have anything like the sort of macro facilities they're used to. By implication, that would imply that they prefer to avoid the GNU linker and related tools as well.

> Just to name a few: you'll need to get parameter passing for functions
> correctly

Which leads to another issue: the 370 is a register-based system without a stack as understood today. Parameters are mostly passed in registers, but this is largely hidden since supervisor calls etc. are usually hidden in macros.

My own feeling is that it would be best to start targeting a late-model 390, which does have a stack etc., and to use the standard GNU assembler and linker (as and ld) /initially/ targeting Linux. Any other combination (i.e. a proprietary assembler etc. with an antique MVS as target) is going to cause nothing but grief, since it makes it very difficult for developers skilled with FPC but not with IBM mainframes to give any practical help.

--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk

[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Reply via email to