On 09/06/2013 01:54 PM, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:

I'm not sure how efficient a RawByteString version ever can be. By
default it has to convert the string into Unicode (Delphi: UTF-16),
and the result back to CP_ACP. In these cases it looks more efficient
to call the Unicode version immediately, and leave *eventual* further
conversions to the compiler. Some routines may implement common
processing of true SBCS, but I'm not sure how many these are.


Of course I need to jump in here ...

While I don't exactly know what you are up to, you might want to read some recent posts of mine where I pointed out that using a fully dynamically encoding auto-converting String type (which does not seem to exist in Delphi) for Objects (and other things) that should not predefine a certain encoding in their interface (making the thingy useful for other Strings while avoiding unnecessary (auto-) conversion) will not impose any noticeable performance degradation, provided some appropriate compiler magic is implemented.

Of course I might be wrong with this analysis, but I _did_ some decent thinking on that.

-Michael
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist  -  [email protected]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Reply via email to