Sven Barth schrieb:
Am 22.09.2014 12:59 schrieb "Hans-Peter Diettrich" <drdiettri...@aol.com
> That's why I also suggested an compiler option, useful for all people
which care about program size or ARC at all.
The problem with the compiler option is that you'd need to rebuild the
complete RTL, packages and your application so that every unit has these
changes. Otherwise e.g. the RTL would still contain reference counting
code and TObject would still contain a reference count field.
Right, it should be a compiler *build* option, so that everybody can
create his favored flavor(s) of the compiler, and decide which one to
use with which project.
Every compiler then should provide a predefined constant for every such
option, in case specific handling is required by conditional compilation
of user code.
> Is it me, or what else makes you so angry today?
> Sorry for that :-(
I'm sorry that I got aggressive, but it's quite frustrating when one
writes a simple example to illustrate something and the first complain
is how to make it use a better design which is completely besides the
point of the example -.-
Then I missed the point of the example(s). It looked to me like
something final, well thought like the rest of your message.
DoDi
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
